Automation and digitization of quality processes can improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance product quality in manufacturing, allowing for more informed decisions that will contribute to long-term success.
Post-market surveillance plays a critical role in the UK’s medical device regulatory framework. Manufacturers must prioritize establishing a comprehensive PMS system, developing clear and organized PMS plans, and promptly reporting incidents and corrective actions.
As part of its reorganization of the CDRH, the FDA has elevated the Office of Strategic Partnerships and Technology Innovation (OST) to a Super Office that will include the Office of Supply Chain Resilience (OSCR), Digital Health Center of Excellence (DHCoE), Office of Technology and Data Services (OTDS), Office of Readiness and Response (ORR) and Office of Equity and Innovative Development (OEID).
Ensuring the safety and efficacy of healthcare products is of utmost importance. The clinical evaluation process of medical devices is vital for demonstrating the device’s safety and performance in accordance with the regulatory requirements. How are device makers navigating this complex process effectively.
510(k) submissions have been a hot topic of late! Before you start your 510k submission make sure you’re aware of the pitfalls. Being responsible for writing and submitting a 510(k) can seem overwhelming – especially when tied to a scheduled product launch or marketing campaign driven by revenue goals. One of the most influential factors to a successful 510(k) submission is strategic planning.
Beyond simply allowing for broader yet more efficient searches, leveraging software to automate literature reviews can organize references, assign screeners, and review screening decisions. This saves time, reduces bottlenecks, and, most importantly, leads to a highly transparent, standardized, and repeatable process that supports continuous CER and PER submissions across a product portfolio and for the life of a device.
